NUMERICAL METHODS FOR DIFFERENTIAL EQNS
PARABOLIC PROBLEMS
∂u∂t - ∆u = f
∫Ω ∂u/∂t v dx + ∫Ω ∇u ∇v dx = ∫Ω f v dx ∀ t
i.c. u(x, to) = u0(x)
b.c. generally could be u(x, t) = g(x, t) on ∂Ω
time and space treated in n ways, we separate the 2 coordinates
a(u,v) = ∫Ω ∇u ∇v dx
We assume existence and uniqueness of solution, no proofs will be given
Stability?
∂u/∂t + ∆u = f → can provide an estimate of stability
∂u/∂t ≠ f → not possible to provide stability → great issue!
for Laplace problem u ∈ H10(Ω) = {u ∈ L2 : ∇u ∈ L2}
here ∀ t u(., t) ∈ H10(Ω)
Continuity ⇒ ||u(α tm) - u(t)| ‖H1→ 0
limh→0 (u(t0+h) - u(t0))/h = ∂u/∂t
NUMERICAL METHODS FOR DIFFERENTIAL EQNS
PARABOLIC PROBLEMS
∂u/∂t - Δu = f
∫Ω ∂u/∂t v - ∫Ω ∇⋅∇v dx = ∫Ω f v dx ∀ t
i.c. u (x, t₀) = u₀ (x)
- We assume homogeneous Dirichlet conditions on the boundary:
- time and space treated in t ways, we separate the 2 coordinates
- sort of time fixed epn.
- a(u,v) = ∫Ω ∇u ∇v dx ⟶ a(u,u) ⩾ α ‖u‖2 α>0
- a(u,u) ⩽ G ‖u‖H¹ ‖u‖H¹
- We want to use these results to estimate solution
Well-posedness
(existence and uniqueness of solution, stability)- unknown u ; data f, g, u₀, ...
- We assume existence and uniqueness of solution, no proofs will be given
- Stability? ⟶ ∂u/∂t + Δu = f
- ⟹ can provide an estimate of stability
- ∂u/∂t - ∆u = f ⟹ not possible to provide stability ⟶ great issue
- for Laplace problem u ∈ H¹0(Ω) = {u ∈ L²: ∇u ∈ L² }
- here ∀ t u (., t) ∈ H¹0(Ω)
- Bochner space u : (t₀,tf) ⟶ H¹0(Ω)
- Continuity ⇒ ‖ u(., tn) - u(E) ‖H¹ ⟶ 0
- Assuming that u ∈ C¹((t₀,tf),H¹(Ω)) is like assuming ∃ and uniqueness of the solution
∫Ω ∂tu(t) ∇v(t) ∇u(t) dx = ∫Ω fu(t) dx
We expect V to be L2, in order to perform ∫Ω∇fv dx
Inequality ‖f g‖X ≤ ‖f‖P ‖g‖q 1/p + 1/q = 1
ƒ ∈ L2(Ω), ‖f‖Lp(Ω) = (∫Ω|f|P dx)1/p c ∞, L² is a particular case (removed space if p=2)
At least must ask v ∈ H01(Ω), here or v = u(t)
- ∂tu(t) + 1/2 ∇u(t) = - ∫Ω u(t) ∇u(t) dx = ⟨u ⋅ ∇u(u[1])⟩ = α(u,u)1/2 ∫Ω |∇u(t)|2 dx + α(u(t),u(t)) = ⟨fu(t) dx ⟩
≤ ‖∫Ω ρu (t)‖ dx ‖u(t)‖L2(Ω)‖∇u(t)‖H10(Ω)
1/2 ∂t ‖u(t)‖2L2 + α‖u(t)‖2H10(Ω) = ∫Ω fu(t)) dx = ⟨f ⋅ ∇u⟩ + α(u(t),u(t)) = ∫Ω fρu(t) dx = e dtilde L f ⋅‖u(t)‖L2
Young Inequality: (a|b| ≤ 1/2 (α2 + b2) or (a|b| ≤ ε/2 (εa2 + 1/ε |b|2)
1/2 ∂t ‖u(t)‖2L2 + α‖u(t)‖2H10(Ω)
≤ 1/2α β‖u(t)⁄L2
∫t₀tp ‖u(t)⁄L2 ‖2 dt = ‖u(t)⁄L2‖2 − ‖u(t)⁄L2‖
⇒ Stability Estimate: ∫ ‖u(tε)⁄L2‖2 + α ∫t₀tp ‖u(t)⁄H10(Ω)‖2 dt 1 α Wim’Im Ballyt 1/α + |u(tε)‖2◻ Problem Discretization
• Weak form: ∫Ω ∂tv dx + α(u,v) = ∫Ω f ⋅ dx ∀ (v ϵ H10(Ω)) (∀ ∈ (t0,tp))
- v ≠ ϕi β(x,t) = ∑ εi υi(t) + ∋
Stiffness matrix = Aij = α(ϕj,ϕi);
Mass matrix = Mι = ∫Ω ι (ϕi) dx)
-
Takehome problems
-
Navier Sokes Problems
-
General useful results and Elliptic Problems
-
Stokes Problems