Matematica finanziaria 2

BINOMIAL MODEL

THE )

(

" (

)

( have

)

call

European Asymmetric

option to

St

ccs.tl pay

K St you

o

K

mox

-

= - -

: - ,

?

fair

the tri

value

What time

at

is ↳ without arbitrage opportunity )

Forward ( bore

construct don't anything

FCT.tl to hay

symmetric contact

St K you

: - -

- asset class

f

Derivatives classifications : payoff

functional shape

( )

MODEL

Toy BERNOULLI t ( )

MODEL t free

risk

yimterest rate

- I rate

o =

,

We two

consider assets bond

)

I B } ( )

B BCI

=L )

: : It

o R

=

2) stock S 1

"

s "

: , see ,

go f

s

= =

different

Two

t

o dr

times d 1

s

Is .

.

. , { ( value t)

Vt St

Bt in

t St

I

-

-

of bonds

number

{ × - ( )

- Value

Portfolio :( im

N o

"

I "

B" "

" " "

+

"

x. ×

: = "

number risky

of asset

y . )

. yep

{ (

value

)

x.

VI z in

( ,

It s

R y z .

t

= .

. ,

↳ variable

random

portfolio (

Def )

Pluto ) machine

with

strategy Vcd and =L

ARBITRAGE making

Money

o

-

: = - (

Proposition de the

to dominate

the allowed

the of

return stock not return

Arsinoe

neo is

on

it n e

: u the bond and versa

vice

Proof : he ( 4) folio

front

07=0

V( o x

Ys ys

t

s

⇐ x

x = =

= - ,

. { }

f

he slate

VH1 by

)

)

I )

od assumption

Suypose Z

Itr Ys t I

u t

x s t s

site = so

= =

- -

, .

}

(

{ )

hi

VIL ) l ) let ) by

Suppose Bail

Itr Ys

d t s -2

t

x

r

it = assumption

SZ

R

> = s

u so

, =

, - .

To holds that

arbitrage of

equivalent

the

that it combination

to

condition is ith is convex u

say

say a

mo . ,

d

and i.e :

.

,

{ d

It gov Old

R t

= psohohlities

!

Hur t the

of

'

: Bernoulli

;D u "

Yg %

!

: -

'

; %= = u

for G-

hnefolili C

④

d)

im which ④

be Q

interpreted )=q

ties prob and t

measure

old

qu old

so

new

as

can a i =

.

. .

, ( ) called

SCI ) Q

E )

@

d

gu RISK

in Pro

Old MEASURE

s

s t NEUTRAL

tr BA

= u s Bluth

. .

. = -

.

Eafscsl

] discounted

)

Gtr expectation

Sco )

s

- .

- .

( ]

/ Xm

Fm

E Xm =

L MARTINGALE

I

. - behaves martingale

discounted

The asset price

B

to

N a

as

. . !

binomial

We extend model

to

want to BINOMIAL TREE MODEL

3

Lsd

Su

/

sur I

/

Sdf this all

free the

arbitrage mln tag model

horrible

model is

sued

su ⇐

I -

/

( Sud

)

Sco s

= free

arbitrage

'

d are

su

"

Sd 's

Let's Su

model

toy

the f

consider applied to Clo

claim ) with )

contingent Scot Slo

- s

s

a - =

.

: - ,

s !

should

the

twqnonille equal

be

output

(

that to

has have

portfolio the

construct

Suppose riskless

to it evolution

want is

a

we same

)

the bond

of portfolio

at the riskeen

is

spin .

f ] )

(

Clu Dsd

) (d) because

(d) it's

)

Itu

Ssu less

risk

C

IT ss IT

c =

= -

=

-

, -

- (d)

)

Tcu IT

where

) asset

old

du the

) portfolio

of risky

b is quantity less

obtain

s rink

im order

- a

= d)

(

s u -

Moreover - take

) TW

th

i -

-

T ( )

Etat

4%19,2

4%11,2

)

Gtr

ITCH tht doit

cast su s

= -

. also

the

discounted

y

EQ

4d) )

" I fun

" " d)

't " )

Old behaves

%

-

do ) Lstm In call price

, t s

eco u =

-

= =

( )

d

S u ,

- It R !

martingale

a

as

EMCH ) I 9,4dB

yfsn

)

In quest

do) .

= -

binomial

the hare

model

For step

with we

3 :

( ]

Ccl3D

" µ÷np Htt

KY (

KY

( ttsquqd (

tf E a)

98 't ( '

)

Clo olds Sd

'

3%2 sued

sus Sud t

%

-

= -

-

- -

,

@ ( ]

IEQ ¥4 (F) t

DN

K

stern 9T "

guk "

( )

- -

CCN) q¥µn

Binomial su k

)

Cco

WITH

MODEL N STEPS -

= =

i ( -

, ( call

of

payoff the

flu

tie )

to T

!

Consider derivative

general

a s

: µ ,

Approach

1) DELTA HEDGING

i )

I already

find

to computed

)

It portfolio

that risk

the

makes lem

want s

we

ss

it .

. ,

Approach

E) REPLICATION

i In

portfolio the

construct

want should

to be

tht

) arbitrage

to

this prices

TIN order

sit ovoid

we a -

. - .

the same : "

" "

I {

fin

:

'

Ii

: '

::

:

: ' www.noron-r.no

=

. . "j

"

"

of

payoff the derivative

derivative

p ,

Vote Ho) Hal to

= martingale

It

equivalent

bond

of measure

the

q et o ]

utld "

flu told

) )

) lolol

d I

)

- "

E

9,101dL

-

I

Hol sten ×

e th

In -

gu

t

a

= s -

-

- t

= -

Tf

. -

.

U

Lt d

R s

-

fo

2

% i

where d

. u

. -

"t paranoia

no

{

it

,

I .

STEP

TIME .

i

Def ARBITRAGE

: )

Vimeo

( PC )

VH

no , A I

step

, me 00

so

, 00

m , =

Def (

financing self

Self The

with

portfolio

strategy ) t

consider xt.tt

tee

a o a

- =

: -

-

. .

.

.

.

,

financing )

I

condition is Xt Yt

Yt St

Xt t t St

tr t

-

: - + e.

, D

It (

portfolio

each At

hold

of

time

that the

t the int hwuho.se

equals the

Yet

value created

at market

says .

, .

, )

Gets (

of Mets)

the held

Value which formed tts

until

portfolio and

t

at

is

new INTEGRALS

STOCHASTIC )

( proof

no

Let to

's the time

continuous

from now . . .

walk

Consider random

a : l÷i÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷

:

¥

H Xlt

of )

variable

Bernoulli Yi Bl ) independent

Yi

Yi

is Ik

tax

sequence =

a : n .

,

.IE Hit

{ EIHHI #

= EEHM.io

.

]

[ Yi f

E I

Sx Dx 0

. -

= - -

- (

? )

@xY.ztC-sxT.f.sxzVAnCxCt5t-iEyVAnC4iT_mCs.x

What Yi

VAN

about the variance =

I

' '

)

Csx

) = St 1¥ [ ]

firm

' 't

if ) with '

St @ order Htt o

and o van

so so

x some -

- =

- Ix d l

so

-

st will linearly

so time

increase in

- >

This called the

is DIFFUSION OF RANDOM

BINOMIAL

LIMIT WALK

Def )

BROWNIAN ( WIENER Process

MOTION

:

) WG

)

I so ( ) independent

(

Process t

Wet

with Wu

independent

2) increments Wr

VVS et

and r

rr u

s

are

: - -

( h

stationary wel

Process with only

3) increments dehemds

wt om

: -

a

+

.

Nfo ) the

Wen to

) t continues

variance

h , f

"

¥%:%"

has

) trajectories

continuous

Hf increase

s MY "

"

L I

Bachelier ) out

St t

1900 t

µ

i = wnwmrh

. drift !

Brownian motion with

Modigliani }

{

St Wt

So Nt

exp r

t

: = er

( )

Geometric Motion

Brownian 1966

GBM binomial

Nit

to

¥

If

ht

emit

Geometric limit the

Brownian walk

of

random

motion i

Consider

a

as I

]

taken fat

the this

parameters Erst

d M

in I

- pus

u =

way e

.

.

: . at

- i

i .

,

following tree

the binomial

Consider : t not

o ist

st -

?

Lsd

Su

✓

I su \

introduce f

: Sud

j

SCO

) s

=

( )

if Pu

{ !

?

{ I a

! . Sd

'

Ii

E cm

- .

.

.

Consider Pu =P : EI

FI (

El EI

Is

" Elli] f

) ] ]

" dm Yi

them Pls

- ) Yi

Yi mph )

Van

=P MP P

VAN p

)

ft )

go =

-

= =

s .

u

=

. a

. )

I Ift

If !

for

Taking leg

the take

limit the

that logarithm them

implies

st so we

so

m

- - . ,

,

defined

be will completely

normal be by

fom its

will and

and variance

a mean

so v.v

m :

- . )

(

of all distributions limit

if

normal

Sum the

normal in

so →

m -

)

( Eesti

3¥ IE )

( Ifi

II

by FI

log trust

(d) crust

logos trust

Yi rust Vst Yi

t Yi

m

= i

- no -

= =

-

, )

) trust

visit

SII

leg I t

limit I

the sling

fins

Take =p

't -

# .

: .

.

, .

. It

V

)

)

5¥

(

( E )

Is

tiny

log FI )

him I Vantil

hast 't

pls

VAN ta 't

Ph

hast

hoist ni

ran r

st

;

- no

-

- =

-

- -

- ,

At o ,

→ St

GBM so

-

n

sits

)

( )

Int

FI

log 't { }

o true

slot it

N

n exp

.

, .

hove for

We like d

want ofsect this

to

how

d

Xt t dwt

meaning

a an r

t

µ

-

: -

?

due differentiable

What !

It not

is

is Iof

Riemann define

glad

HGH this

finite to

integral be

should integral

Steffen total variation in order

a

:

- t

forma !

integral that

Consider due

the obvious

dwt finite

in !

wt total variation

not

is

: a

i

fo !

always

it

in it down

foes and

up ?

So Iti

the

define integral

can you filtration

I

Im )

have (

stochastic

to introduce

process { Fist

to

consider

order F Xt

IP

you a

a i , ,

, ,

)

I measurable It that filtration

want the

We adapted

Ft

that information

Xt the

the and im

is in

- means

.

stochastic t the

until

process is same

{ stochastic

861 process 'll )

Def oil

l

f E

, El ) ]

go

845 the

to

r ,

, '

dense L

in

are

,

Alf )

Ctu constant tm

to

tuts

every is

f

Function om T

simple

: o =

i . -

- ,

, !

constant

constant variable

random

in just

not

f a

B

n a

. . ,

functions dense that

L2

Remark simple approximate

it precise

im means

are as

I can on

;

i function

function

want simple

with

i a

an

I ! HIM

Hill

Egf )

Hits

Ito f

fltldgltl

integral

Def f -

= =

: I value beginning

the

the at

take

I

,

function

fltt

here constant

Heh

integrated w.r.to wine

in process

a

n.rs .

-

. stochastic

:/

?

)

the C

Consider Xt

{ Ftl

EP

process r

: . to

, ,

Def if ft Fe measurable Ft adapted

Xt

Xt in is

: -

- for

filtration ×

Def which

minimal Fe

call

if I

the

E adapted

is we

is

: ,

OJ

Xt

"

" NATURAL FILTRATION )

(

filtration information

of

flow "

The "

like the the Flow

is information ?

"

}

Xu Ft

foggy

the

Consider { the

process Yes

} because

event

and A

f

e. Xt A

9 E

r

-

-

. . .

+

.

defined

t completely

time the A

at event in . ?

} '

event because

the

Consider Ft defined

No completely

foggy A A not

in

A c-

g

r

= u . .

,

.

function .tn

Consider ti b

simple to

grid a

f

a oven a -

.

. .

.

.

. .

,

. ,

,

f I

have ]

by definition 7¥ Wtsi

)

WC )

Isil sits

we of

dw

yes , -

,

tm

b

its

to ,

-

as -

Remark dense Llap

step constant harnesses

wine in

are

: - , ¥

} g

:{

!

Med

I T Liam

If

Remark step

the constant harnesses

consider fess

wine f e

-

: . .

here step constant Wiener

hwan

glad the process

wine integrated

is wit

N a

B -

. . ITS

PROCEDURE Ca

?

L b)

THE

DEFINE Process

FOR A

TO INTEGRAL g E ,

§ )

( '

} ds

{ fld

simple

1) fmls

of )

E

inmate

A processes sit

with

thnx o

f →

gm -

sequence

a .

④

Substantially { fmcsig

sit glass

→

. b

! dm

2) well defined

"

the Smh

For integral stochastic variable

each it

is is

an

a and

m ,

Es

to there variable

stochastic

possible that exists t

prove En

Z z

s

e as →

as

m

.

. !

3)

2)

Pr

o

pos i t o

n

Is

§ firms fmlsldwlsl

glad west

stochastic

3) define the

We integral -

-

on

now .

.

Properties : b

§ lab ) I

) (

gladness )

Ef

Ef ELSYSD ds

glad the

of integral

Wess ) Ito

1) o isometry

- =

a

- :

2

"

"

! Fbw

glad Wcs measurable

)

3) is -

the

i m

Proof where

of simple

hnohhty g

case

I is : )

)

fb El l

III

EL )

III

) fftullwftkte wltkte

Ef SHH tu

) Few

defends

)

tie - adapted

giddiness Since

- is

g

=

. .

. ,

]

lo def

By

behaviour

value interval

only the Wiener tie

the

the of

the

fftnl process

on on , . .

)

(

has fftr

increments Thus have

Wftu

I

independent independent )

of

WH

VV in we

so :

-

* . .

) ) )

El Eff flutters

)

fltullwltnte )

Wftu)

) Mtn

Hid )

#

Dawg

.

- o

- - =

- ↳ o

to where Lto !

stochastic

find Eat ]

west f tse process

in

E

B

t

n , a

,

. . ,

MARTINGALES Eko Efx

If EH }

)

Def if Fsu

Xt

D Eat ] martingale

if

the

drafted I

} if

is is

r is e

co -

: -

, ,

Fito Efx

If Efxtl

File

)

if

Xt Eat ] if

the

drafted martingale

} If

is Xs

r is super

a

co File

, ,

IT Efx

If EH

] martingale

if

Xt Eat ] if sub

the

odafted I

} if

is Xs

r is a

co

, , ! Few

:#

L the

For martingale

precess It fksdwls

)

process is

f

any an

E : -

=

: ,

)

Proof them

(

srt

consider :

: , !

!

! ) ! ]

)

EL

El ! ) Ef

(

dunt

SH I I Fsu

Fit

Ew Fsu I

WH fluid

fluid Shawn

was

went

said

E t

= = Fsu adapted

)

! -

If !

§ WH

fluid Dta

dwlul

glad

was gun

t =

=

huberty

for

↳ I

o § !

that

Now Maids

Xt rdwlsl

)

No it t

nmow

we =

: x

a I

FT

DM Riemann to

TERM

f)

{ d dwt

!

Ndt to differential

stochastic equation

,

G forms

the