Finanza computazionale

LOGIN - Define the following theorem

i" 'Define t ( fo) following) ffft er Them- 'Clt with hasem) the hrebolilistic representationSoe yy := =, ., Soe)f)f ]XT ) El'tXt ") t't )sent t h't (f r(It )( Sof( htt- t where) XtytrliH- t ItHt )H # -¥ -y . t= === . ., fThem of bythe solution givenis :{ ¥f 'ffOfft IE) O( I ]( often'stetHt f let oldHis) V-teeo.TTHeo)r tt+ . s-. .-IR)ft hlytrli) AHt× - t, = -Theorem ( )PIDE PRICEALTERNATIVE LOGIN - iDefine (At fo))) f'Clt Themwith em of bythe solutionSoey givenis is=, := .,{ Itf't 04¥ !offt.ieE) I210¥Cr E rflt.gl '"" t et old" " team," v.' H+ "t -. o' .'. - .° ",flax hey) +.net, +, .= . )(Theorem PIDE NESSLOG MONEYIN :- I)(bytotimeDefine forwardlogthe maturity emtheand ta tmoney z rezmess y t: =- . .,theRewriting valuepayoff variablesthe terms of theseand option in new :)e 't Xxrt t( - ( 1)th) etft)UCE T keC zz =-- -- ,, ,ofThe the

))E's 's o's sot' oe=t - ,-- ,t -!It"!';' of Barriertheleveethewhere* )see isv. istoD ,METHODS RECAP : Emon een( ,Emoticon /emcI ( )1) Barrier2) monitoringAge continuous→Fft I! Barrier ( )Discrete monitoringvcon )(- AmericanEmoticon→3) Barrierµ →, (\\ )monitoringDiscretelook bookmaimThe lowerof continuous thethan discretemonitoring monitoringvalue beshould value inn.rs a.For European but withlofhniceboth log schemes fineoption anda messmoney aare-, ,transformationlog barriertheBarrier the log thebetter hosoption sinceisprice messmoney. .that !from timeden ends (E)Zak!log numerically) notS re foodD t=-- followingIstheNow want howstudy beto therewrittenPIDE incan caseswe :finitePossibilities Levy1) activity3 : finiteinfinite withLevy2) activity variationsinfiniteinfinite with3) Levy activity variationsIm I:]( Otto"whatparticular Hftexplicitlyto becomesf- letwant oldIttest ) ))iswe know s- a--IR)( alternative log price case-

Ifinitelevy1) activity :!! fld ) ft ofwitholds t intensity lowPoisson) 's of the and= hnoass. funk size= -- si.a)-!! offty! motto ¥491 )"xfft letletthis ) OHHCdt) ocdz) )~ ayr . .~ === , , ,, IOtay! Hulda0¥41 )ItffOfffj V-teco.is(E ) It 't( E ) oPIDE .t -yrt x -r +: - ,- IRdy 2finiteinfinite withLevy) activity variations2 fo (dy) t co° = #.a)IR !! dfftOtto ¥491 )" letlet ) OHH) ocdz) assn - - == dy, , I ]IOtay f! 0¥41 HisHft V-teco.is) ) vldzrfftOfljty test )E( E yPIDE sot -r +: .. - IRdy 2 -'Iinfiniteinfinite with3) Levy activity variations!{ olds) to° = itthe thecannot rewrite remainsPIDEweso same .,! of¥nezi , adz, +,. •. =AF. VF I.AI. I.t tA V.. ...I ( X)dyV tis tox toIRface ' 1) )01dB as- ar't totopFINITE FORSCHEMEDIFFERENCE PRICINGFinite difference for differentialmethods schemes replacingpartial based derivativesreanimationoff equationsare onfinite differencesby equationsthein pricing .In lovethe beof term

function thelinear to be payoff iteratively at step result each starting solved time system is a .

Example : There two define with Levy Besto process are B ways iv. a :. 't ) European () call where 'with with Levy E 'option Xt triplet SoeIBos St ris ora• -:- ,. ,. ert ¥+ ) flevy 'triplet) he with St where E 'So Orisz a -:= , ," ( (EtWe ) ) St Levy triple Elog the 'consider XtSoe e- rr ocomun: -- -. ,- , GII off(off FF){ ] Catthethert IRotr -t - - , to We want solve i ( ultfan exs txt ". . - )(1) to to following DOMAIN have love Xmaxdomainbounded IRtheWe to Xmmmake passagemovewe →:: ,. VIElt z( rt .r Since -ofthethat ) solution S Ncowithis SoeBds I2-knowwe n: .--,6)6)( Plz 10-8IPthat Z I taker>and = - we :: ,E)( VI 6 {rTt{ .--Smw Eli( vi.So Xmrv are r --= =F)( ,t Elitr ( VI 6Xmas.- r+r .SoSmn -e , ==,. 9fltxmaxWhat )