Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
vuoi
o PayPal
tutte le volte che vuoi
UNSCOP
the European Jews who survived WW2 was to settle in Palestine. Additionally, the UNSCOP
th
outlined a geographical division of Palestine, approved by the UN on the 29 of September
1947. The UN’s decision made many Palestinians voluntarily join the Arab League; the
65
beginning of the war was at that point inevitable .
2.4 The First Arab-Israeli War
The day after the UN assembly, violence spread through Palestine. The first Arab-Israeli
war had just started. It lasted until 1949, taking on the shape of a civil war between the Yishuv
and the Arab-Palestinian communities from 1947 to 1948 and a conventional war between
sovereign states from 1948 to 1949.
Although both sides had strengths and weaknesses, the key distinctive elements were the
mediocre support of the entirety of the Arab world towards Palestinians, opposed to the
motivation both Zionists in Palestine and all over the world felt for their own cause. On top of
that, the organization of the Yishuv first and the State of Israel later on contrasted with the
plethora of Palestinian militias lacking a central organization.
The civil war started positively for the Arabs, actively controlling a few Jewish districts,
66
but their achievements were swiftly nullified by the Jewish counteroffensive .
Nevertheless, it is true that, unlike the self-reliant Arab villages, the Yishuv did suffer
from its dependence on external supplies, undermined by the war.
62 Ivi, p. 221.
63 Ivi, p. 222.
64 United Nations Special Committee on Palestine.
65 Ivi, pp. 207-327.
66 Ibidem. 23 attempt to neutralize the widespread Arab
The war was later reshaped by the Haganah’s
defense,
cells, turning the Yishuv’s previously aimed for its own survival, to an opportunity for
conquest. Indeed, this is what split Jerusalem in half: West Jerusalem was conquered and
controlled by the Jewish forces; East Jerusalem was controlled by the Arabs.
Meanwhile, the Arab League and the Muslim Brotherhood jointly attacked several
kibbutzim. th
On the 14 of May 1948, David Ben-Gurion read the Israeli Declaration of Independence
at the Tel Aviv Museum: The State of Israel had just been established.
Despite the celebrations and the joy that took place on that historic day, Ben-Gurion
couldn’t help but feel the imminence of the conflict between the
himself, along with the Yishuv,
newborn Jewish State and the Arab States. The Yishuv did feel that such a conflict would have
resulted in a Jewish defeat. Although the Arab League intended on destroying the Jewish State,
the little organization and the embargo on war supplies implied that the Arabs would have rather
hoped for external help, possibly by the UN.
War rhetoric eventually took over. Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon and Syria took part in the war;
the same would happen in every future conflict in the Middle East.
The UN appointed Folke Bernadotte as a mediator in the conflict. On top of forcing a
truce, he suggested Palestine’s partition into two states, but both sides rejected the proposal.
During Bernadotte’s truce, the Jewish State founded 67
the IDF , strengthened during the
ceasefire. The conflict, however, renewed after an offensive by the Egyptians.
The war eventually ended and was won by the State of Israel, but despite that, Jordan
came out of it with territory from central Palestine (the West Bank) and Egypt with the Gaza
strip. Furthermore, another outcome of the conflict was a considerable amount of Palestinian
68 69
refugees. Indeed, in 1950, the UNRWA was established for this very reason .
Around seven-hundred-thousand Palestinians became refugees and the reasons for that
being are many and still uncertain. This could be either due to inner conflicts between the Arabs,
due to the loss of ownership of lands, lack of political participation or lack of employment. The
problem could also have originated directly from the Zionist attempt to free the Arab lands of the
Arab Palestinians.
A progressive exodus had indeed taken place. The rich Arabs first fled on the eve of the
war, causing many schools to close and unemployment to spread. Alongside them, many
67 The Israel Defence Forces.
68 United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East.
69 Ivi, pp. 207-327. 24
Palestinians were evacuated by Jewish military forces or fled themselves at the very beginning of
the conflict. Palestinians were eventually systematically displaced by the Israeli military, rather
than fleeing voluntarily. Day after day, this problem increased, especially due to the fact that the
Arab states were reluctant to grant access to the refugees, who nevertheless wished to return to
70
their homes .
2.5 The 1950s and the Suez Crisis
The years after the First Arab-Israeli War could have been an opportunity for both the
State of Israel and the Arab States to establish a significant diplomatic dialogue, but immediately
after the conflict, the situation was somewhat fluid: Arab media talked about revenge and
injustice, whilst some Arabs did think of coexistence as the only peaceful possibility.
Furthermore, The State of Israel felt the pressure of being encircled by its enemies. Peace was,
therefore, far from reality. The State of Israel eventually did not compromise by ceding territories
and the Arab States’ policy was influenced by public opinion, leading them to not recognize the
71
State of Israel .
The refugee issue worsened the relations between States even more when many refugees
eventually infiltrated Israel’s territory to either go back to their homes and recover personal
objects or to farm their old lands. Although both Jordan and Egypt condemned the illegal
infiltrations, the State of Israel was inflexible in seeing them as a form of guerrilla.
The Jewish State responded by destroying old Arab areas, by shooting any Arab
trespassing the borders and by expelling those on Israel’s ground.
A few, amongst the IDF too, questioned the moral efficacy of Israel’s reaction, especially
when the IDF’s Unit 101 was established. The unit often penetrated the Gaza strip and the West
Bank. In Qibya, in the West Bank, for instance, more than sixty Arabs were killed by the Unit
101, in response to the murder of two Israeli children and a woman. The IDF later explained that
they attacked, unaware of the presence of those people, but Jordan pathologists later denied this
after they had found out that the injuries on the bodies were caused by gunshots and not by the
72
collapse of rubble .
Nasser’s manifest Arab policy in Egypt, along with Moshe Dayan’s appointment to the
Ministry of Defence in Israel, heightened the already tense situation.
70 Ibidem.
71 Ivi, pp. 328-381.
72 Ibidem. 25
Nasser’s nationalization of the Suez Canal in 1956, caused the British and the French
(who had owned and operated the Canal since its construction) to jointly attack Egypt, with the
support of Israel.
The Suez Crisis is essential to understand the dynamics in the Middle East during the
73
Cold War. The USSR sided and protected Egypt against The State of Israel ; the USA was also
Western interests. Nevertheless, the Crisis’ biggest outcome was a
involved in protecting
widespread surge of radicalism through the entire region: after 1956, the Arab States’ aim was to
74
obliterate the State of Israel .
2.6 The Six-Day War
In May of 1967, the Egyptian military entered Sinai, causing concern amongst the Israeli
government and military forces. In addition to that, the USSR informed Egypt of suspect Israeli
75
military presence on the border with Syria. This is the scenario that led to the Six-Day War .
Mutual defense treaties between Egypt, Syria and Iraq developed due to Nasser’s
leadership, while the UN agreed on leaving both Sinai and the Gaza strip, as requested by Egypt.
This might have been a mere demonstration of power and strength on the Egyptian part, but it
triggered Israel’s response, supported by the USA.
The purpose behind the engage of the Jewish State, militarily more powerful, was strictly
defensive and aimed at defeating Egypt. The IDF later gave in to the hic et nunc of the conflict
and ended up crushing the Egyptian troops in just a few days, allowing Israel to easily conquer
the Gaza strip, Sinai and the Suez Canal. Hussein of Jordan also entered the war, despite both
Israel and the UN issued a non-intervention warrant. On top of the newly annexed Egyptian
territories, Israel managed to conquer the Old City of Jerusalem, as well as the West Bank in a
matter of two days.
The swift and unforeseen victory of the State of Israel generated a pervasive sense of
messianic extremism, resulting from the feeling that Eretz Yisrael had been granted to its ancient
inhabitants, at last. The conquered territories were, indeed, seen as a prelude to redemption.
On a diplomatic level, the Six-Day War made the State of Israel a regional power, allied
76
with the Western world .
73 Nikolaj Bulganin, head of the government, once told the Israeli that hate towards their State was spreading.
74 Benny Morris, Vittime. Storia del conflitto arabo-sionista 1881-2001, tr. it. di Stefano Galli, RCS Libri S.p.A.,
Milano 2002 [2001], pp. 328-381.
75 Ivi, pp. 382-437.
76 Ibidem. 26
Jewish settlements sprung near the new borders, like the one of Kiryat Arba, in the
outskirts of Hebron. The new Jewish communities were often raised on public ground,
preventing Indigenous people in the Gaza strip and the West Bank from growing and thriving.
The enormous conquests made by Israel awakened a sense of identity within the
under Israel’s control since 1948, a military
Palestinian people. Although they had been living
occupation was established following the Six-Day war of 1967.
Although the IDF was willing to allow the West Bank to keep in touch with the Arab
world, Moshe Dayan’s uncompromising policy prevailed: a colonialist economy was put in
place, manifesting itself in the form of Indigenous labor for the State of Israel, as well as in the
form of evictions. The local Palestinian economy was therefore compromised due to the absence
of competition and the dependence on Israeli products.
The occupation was immediately despised by Palestinians, whose resistance was opposed
to resignation. Despite Israel’s
by Israel; Palestinians either engaged in armed combat or gave in
attempt to depict the occupation as benign, it involved torture, humiliation and intimidation.
Israel’s measures to counteract the dissent ended up amplifying Palestinian nationalism.
The Arab States, now under the aegis of the USSR, were reluctant to admit their own
defeat, strengthening their opposition to dialogue; Israel was nevertheless averse to it, as well.
The Resolution 242, issued by the UN, demanded Israel to leave the occupied territories and
77
pressured the Arab States to reject belligerency .
2.7 The Yom Kippur War
A few years later, new Egyptian president Anwar Sadat considered war to be the only
a