U à S N
niversit degli tudi di apoli
F ederico II
Dipartimento di Ingegneria Elettrica e
delle Tecnologie dell’Informazione
Classe di Laurea in Ingegneria dell’Informazione, Classe n. L.8
Corso di Laurea in Ingegneria Elettronica
Elaborato di Laurea
Hard-Switching behaviour in SMPS: analysis and consideration
Anno Accademico
2017/2018
Appendix A
Switch-mode power converter
compensation
A switch mode power supply regulates the output voltage against any change in the
output loading or in the input line voltage. To accomplish this regulation, a feedback
loop is required. Since the feedback loop requires compensation if it has an error
amplifier with linear feedback, different solutions and compensation techniques may
be used, depending on the topology and characteristics of the power converter.
This section’ aim is to provide an overview of the most common compensation
techniques with a particular focus on the Type II compensation for a boost converter
working in the CCM with a peak current mode control. Although, there are many
techniques to select the compensation component values, the method used for the
project and shown in this section is based upon setting the mid-band gain of the error
amplifier transfer function. To create Bode plot of gain and phase for the power stage
and error amplifier, Matlab software has been used, its code is reported at end of the
section, in order to observe how it changes in compensation or the way the power stage
affects the gain and phase system in.
A.1 Compensation Techniques
The SMPS can work on two different operation modes: CCM and DCM. The
regulation of the output voltage is obtained through a feedback loop which needs to be
compensated since power converter are naturally unstable because of presence of zeros
and poles. The compensation choice depends on the control technique used for the
loop: VMC or CMC as well.
Typically, compensations techniques are divided into three categories or
types: I, II, III compensator type. 90
A.1.1 Type I error amplifier
Figure A.1 shows a Type I error amplifier configuration, which is the simplest form
of compensation. It consists of a single pole and the amplifier is an inverting
configuration with a virtual short between V and V . The feedback impedance
FB REF
divided by the input impedance gives the small signal gain, since the R may be seen
FBB
as an AC ground and it is possible to ignore it because it does not affect the AC transfer
function. Figure A.1 Type I error amplifier compensation [22].
By summing the currents at the error-amplifier inputs, the relation is the following:
1 1
( )
+ = + (1)
Since we are interested in the transfer function, we need to write the feedback voltage
in terms of input or control voltage. It is possible to notice that the feedback voltage
may be related to the control voltage by the open loop gains of the amplifier, in this
way the Eq. 2: −
= (2)
Combining Equations 1 and 2:
1
( )
=− (3)
1
1 + ∙ (1 + )
If the gain of the error amplifier is large enough:
91
( )≫1
(4)
+
Then the closed-loop gain can be expressed as:
≈− =− (5)
Where w defines the error amplifier pole frequency:
EA 1
= (6)
∙
The Equation 6 reveals a single pole at the origin, and it is limited at the DC by the
open-loop gain of the amplifier and it is called dominant-pole compensation. Its
frequency response is depicted in Fig. A.2
Figure A.2 Type I error amplifier compensation [22].
Type I compensation is often used for a constant-current type load, such as a light-
emitting diode (LED) load with no output capacitor. It is also clear that using this
technique for any power supply or systems does not offer the flexibility necessary to
achieve an optimal performance [43]. 92
A.1.2 Type II error amplifier
The schematic of a Type II error amplifier is shown in Fig. A.3.
Figure A.3 Type II error-amplifier compensation [43].
Using the same derivation process as for Type II compensation, the Equation 7
expresses the voltage-gain transfer function:
1 +
≈− (7)
1+
where A is defined as the mid-band voltage gain which results in:
VM
≈ (8)
The voltage-gain transfer function (Eq.7) reveals the presence of a high-frequency pole
at: 1
≈ , ≫ (9)
and a zero at: 1
= (10)
Also, in this case, the open-loop gain of the amplifier will limit the error-amplifier gain
at DC but less compared to Type I. Generally, Type II compensation is well suited for
use with current-mode control [43]. Figure A.3 shows the approximation of the
frequency response of Type II error amplifier.
93
Figure A.4 Frequency response for a Type II error amplifier [43].
A.1.3 Type III error amplifier
<Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
-
Appunti Convertitori DC-DC
-
Notizia di reato, condizioni di procedibilità
-
Campi Elettromagnetici - Condizioni al contorno
-
Condizioni ed enunciati dei teoremi