Estratto del documento

AHP

Matrices:

- 1 matrix: criteria vs criteria with respect to the goal

- “x” matrices: subcriteria vs subcriteria with respect to their “parent” criteria (for each criteria that has subcriteria)

- “n” matrices: alternatives vs alternatives with respect to all the lower level criteria

(Check consistency: CR > 0,1)

To get the final decision:

1. Calculate the rating of the criteria and subcriteria, as well as the rating of the alternatives with respect to the

criteria and subcriteria

2. Calculate the final rating (overall priority) of each alternative by multiplying and summing rating of criteria and

rating of alternative against each criterion/subcriterion

3. Rank alternatives using overall priority (highest value is the 100%, all the others are: value/value max)

• Overall Priority (alt 1) = alt1*AVE(subcrit1)*WEIGHT(subcrit1) + alt1*AVE(subcrit2)*WEIGHT(subcrit2) +

alt1*AVE(criteria2) + alt1*AVE (criteria3) + …

• Overall Priority (alt2) = alt2* …

• Overall Priority (alt3) = alt3* …

⟹ Project with highest value is the best one

+ we could do a sensitivity analysis (What if analysis) → if all criteria equal (only main criteria)

ANOVA ONE WAY

Anova one way:

Stat → Anova → One way

- Response = outcome of the experiment (Y)

- Factor = process variables that affect the output (in 1 way: 1 factor)

Storage: Residuals

Graph: all graphs

Options: Confidence level = 95%

• BOXPLOT → idea of the distribution of the sample (check outliers)

• NORMAL PROBABILITY PLOT to understand id the distribution is normal (S line is normal)

• P-VALUE → if < 0,05, we reject the null hypothesis (⟹ exists at least one μ different from the others) and so the

factor is significant in terms of impact on the response variable

• STANDARD DEVIATION (S) → standard deviation of the distance between data values and fitted values

(budgeted). It tells how well the model describes the response (the lower the better!)

• F-VALUE → MS (factor) / MS (error) (the higher the better)

adj adj

• R-SQ(ADJ) (= 1 – (MSerr/MStot)) → percentage of variation in the response that is explained by the model. The

factors that are included in the model are explaining the “R-sq(adj)”% of the variation that is present in the

response variable (a good value is higher than 70%).

→ If p-value < 0,05 and R-sq(adj) is very low, it means that we did not take into account other factors that are

having an impact on the y variable.

• RSQ = 1 – (SS error / SS total)

Usually it is better to consider the Rsq(adj) since it is more conservative as it is taking into consideration the

number of predictors and the number of observations that are in the model.

• R-SQ(PRED) tells which is the fit of the model, so which is the capability of the model to predict new variables.

• MEAN the best one is the one that has the highest value because we want to maximize the response variable.

Anteprima
Vedrai una selezione di 3 pagine su 6
Minitab procedures for Exam - Toolbox - prof. Portioli Pag. 1 Minitab procedures for Exam - Toolbox - prof. Portioli Pag. 2
Anteprima di 3 pagg. su 6.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Minitab procedures for Exam - Toolbox - prof. Portioli Pag. 6
1 su 6
D/illustrazione/soddisfatti o rimborsati
Acquista con carta o PayPal
Scarica i documenti tutte le volte che vuoi
Dettagli
SSD
Scienze economiche e statistiche SECS-P/08 Economia e gestione delle imprese

I contenuti di questa pagina costituiscono rielaborazioni personali del Publisher paolo.putti di informazioni apprese con la frequenza delle lezioni di Industrial management toolbox e studio autonomo di eventuali libri di riferimento in preparazione dell'esame finale o della tesi. Non devono intendersi come materiale ufficiale dell'università Politecnico di Milano o del prof Portioli Staudacher Alberto.
Appunti correlati Invia appunti e guadagna

Domande e risposte

Hai bisogno di aiuto?
Chiedi alla community