We may define persuasion as:
a process (+ dynamic, inevitable)
interactive, or intersubjective process
each act of persuasion involves at least two actors: the persuader and the
persuadee/persuaded
aimed by the goal of producing an action (a change in attitude or behavior)
persuasion may be defined as an inevitable and commonplace,
“Generally speaking,
dynamic, interactive or intersubjective process, involving at least two interlocutors,
actors, or parties: Persuasion is a process, and a
the persuader and the persuadee(s).
dynamic one, in which participants aim to influence or produce an action, broadly
intended as a change in beliefs system or behavior. Persuasion’s three main features might
be listed as:
commonplace, inevitable and pervasive;
reciprocal and interactional; third,
goal-oriented: those engaged in persuasion aim to produce a change, which – be it in
thought, opinions, attitudes, behavior or action – determines persuasion’s level of
success.
Persuasion: inevitable and commonplace a phenomenon
Persuasion as a process is in itself inevitable and commonplace (pervasiveness of persuasion).
communication,
In this sense, “persuasion is indeed related to the more general process of
which is itself an inevitable intersubjective phenomenon”. Every behavior is a kind of
communication: because behavior does not have a counterpart (there is no anti-behavior), it is
not
not possible to communicate. Everything communicates even beyond people’s intentions (I
communicate what the other understands).
Interaction - reciprocity
The very interactional nature of persuasion implies a move, or propensity, toward the
structuring of others’ positions, beliefs, thoughts, emotions, actions. This may be more or less
openly conscious or intentional, and work or not to yield successful results.
Goal-oriented: level of success
persuasion is successful when a sufficiently balanced measure between the other’s
➢ liked) to produce
acceptance (liking) and our own self confirmation (being is obtained, so
action. interchange of active and passive
This balanced measure can also be obtained by means of
➢
roles in time
* when no reaction in the persuaded, and the game is played by one character only, we are
➢ persuasion attempt,
facing a i.e. the persuasive process gets interrupted and fails. The
persuasive process, to be fulfilled, requires some sort of (active) response on the part of the other
+ endurance in time.
• The apparent lack of reciprocity of certain games evidently starting from one actor operating on
interactional nature of persuasion.
an apparently passive ‘recipient’ does not deny the
In fact, no persuasion can be fulfilled just relying on the ‘being liked’ (passive) response. Some
sort of (active) ‘liking’ response on the part of the persuaded must also be performed, in order for
the process to produce an action […] broadly intended changes in beliefs, or behavior.
Persuasion is interactive and its responsibility is always shared.
Strategic vs everyday communication
The difference is made by how and to what extent is the intention of structuring the responses of
others to developing events is deliberate. Strategic communication is to be identified in all those
not only more evident and
communicative situations where the persuasive intent is
deliberate, declared
but within the definitional underpinnings of the communicative situation
typically
itself. Strategic are thus the forms of communication characterized by persuasion.
Persuasion specifically characterizes the political field as a choice area of strategic
communication because of the very definitional underpinnings of the political action: “the
political process typically involves persuasion. Since the doing of politics is predominantly
political discourse
constituted in language, focusing on means observing an important source
of evidence on how persuasion works.
Focus on “Political”…
• …language (‘politichese’ vs. pol. vocabulary) political vocabulary or a very difficult way of
→
talking
• …communication (external vs. internal) it is internal when it is between the politicians,
→
whereas it is external when politicians talk to the citizens
• …discourse (innerstate vs. interstate) it is “innerstate” if it involves the board of the state,
→
whereas its in “interstate” if it is addressed to the entire world.
• …texts (various forms of)
• …speeches (kind of texts)
discourse speech discourse”, speech
NB vs. (e.g. “Contemporary American Political but “the
delivered by Reagan in 1981”)
Discourse is a social practice: a process ‘substance’ which can be experienced, acted,
observed.
text
The is any form of discoursal manifestation: the product of that process ‘substance’
(verbal – oral/written – and/or visual or behavioral substance ready to be analyzed). Type
of text is defined as “genre”.
genre communicative events,
A comprises a class of the members of which share a set
communicative purposes.
of These purposes are recognized by the expert members of
the parent discourse community, and thereby constitute the rationale for the genre. The
rationale shapes the schematic structure of the discourse and influences the choice of
content and style. Genres also come with a ‘formal shape’, or “register” (field, mode and
tenor) and operate in given “contexts”.
The “REGISTER” is a particular configuration of meanings that are typically associated
with a specific configuration of field, mode and tenor. Since “register” is a configuration of
meanings, it also includes expressions, the lexico-grammatical and phonological features.
FIELD it is the area of activity (eg. Science, technology, law ecc.)
TENOR it is linked to the language choice, determined by the roles of participants
(language choice changes if the dialogue is between to experts or if it is between an expert
and a student)
MODE it has to do with the role played by the language, the channel (written/spoken)
and the rhetorical mode (persuasive, expository, didactic).
“CONTEXT” it is the (mental) structure of some characteristics of the social situation
→
that are important to produce and to comprehend the discourse. It includes the situation,
the setting (time and place), ongoing actions (discourses and discourse genres), the role of
participants, as well as their mental representations such as goals, knowledge, opinions,
attitudes and ideologies. The context is not objective or deterministic, but it is subjective
to participant’s