Anteprima
Vedrai una selezione di 20 pagine su 115
Corporate finance and Financial institutions - appunti completi Pag. 1 Corporate finance and Financial institutions - appunti completi Pag. 2
Anteprima di 20 pagg. su 115.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Corporate finance and Financial institutions - appunti completi Pag. 6
Anteprima di 20 pagg. su 115.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Corporate finance and Financial institutions - appunti completi Pag. 11
Anteprima di 20 pagg. su 115.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Corporate finance and Financial institutions - appunti completi Pag. 16
Anteprima di 20 pagg. su 115.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Corporate finance and Financial institutions - appunti completi Pag. 21
Anteprima di 20 pagg. su 115.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Corporate finance and Financial institutions - appunti completi Pag. 26
Anteprima di 20 pagg. su 115.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Corporate finance and Financial institutions - appunti completi Pag. 31
Anteprima di 20 pagg. su 115.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Corporate finance and Financial institutions - appunti completi Pag. 36
Anteprima di 20 pagg. su 115.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Corporate finance and Financial institutions - appunti completi Pag. 41
Anteprima di 20 pagg. su 115.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Corporate finance and Financial institutions - appunti completi Pag. 46
Anteprima di 20 pagg. su 115.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Corporate finance and Financial institutions - appunti completi Pag. 51
Anteprima di 20 pagg. su 115.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Corporate finance and Financial institutions - appunti completi Pag. 56
Anteprima di 20 pagg. su 115.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Corporate finance and Financial institutions - appunti completi Pag. 61
Anteprima di 20 pagg. su 115.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Corporate finance and Financial institutions - appunti completi Pag. 66
Anteprima di 20 pagg. su 115.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Corporate finance and Financial institutions - appunti completi Pag. 71
Anteprima di 20 pagg. su 115.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Corporate finance and Financial institutions - appunti completi Pag. 76
Anteprima di 20 pagg. su 115.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Corporate finance and Financial institutions - appunti completi Pag. 81
Anteprima di 20 pagg. su 115.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Corporate finance and Financial institutions - appunti completi Pag. 86
Anteprima di 20 pagg. su 115.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Corporate finance and Financial institutions - appunti completi Pag. 91
1 su 115
D/illustrazione/soddisfatti o rimborsati
Disdici quando
vuoi
Acquista con carta
o PayPal
Scarica i documenti
tutte le volte che vuoi
Estratto del documento

Investment Analysis

A BB200.000 200.000Overall investment Overall investmentExpected return of the portfolio- 30.000 170.000R = X R + X R = ⋅ 0.03 + ⋅ 0.05p A A B B 200.000 200.000Can be used for : historical return (average realized return) and future return‣- The expected return is weighted average of returns or a linear combination of returns (can be used with historical values or future ones)Expected return in the future or in the past depending on what I use is the weighted average or the linear combination‣ 2 2 2 2Variance of a Portfolio : [sigma A, B is the covariance of A and B]- X σ + 2X X σ + X σA B A,B B BA AFrom this if I use the square root I can find the Standard Deviation‣ I have to know the standard deviation of the stocks VAR or sigma, then multiply the square of each weight fo the variance‣- Expected return = linear combination- Variance = square of the weigh multiplied by the variance of A + square of the weigh multiplied by the variance of B +

covariance (involvesboth) involves the multiplication of the two weights

Example : Invest 60% in A and 40% in B- (it lies in between 17.5 and 5.5)

R = 0.6 ⋅ 17.5% + 0.4 ⋅ 5.5 % = 12.7 %

p2 2 4σ = 0.6 ⋅ 0.0668 + 2 ⋅ 0.6 ⋅ 0.4 ⋅ (− 0.0049) + 4 ⋅ 0.0132 = 0.023851p 2 (lies between the two standard deviation 15 and 11 of the two stocks)

σ = σ = 0.023851 = 0.1544 = 15.44 %p p- Diversification of risk :Standard deviation of portfolio is less compared to the simple weighted average of individual‣ standard deviations

Simplest way in which you can explain risk of return• 3 - 25 {chapter10}- We have past returns : use formula to find the past (apply backward)

EXERCISE : Weights of Coca Cola and Apple- Amount invested

Weight of each stock Formula = If you sum the two value you obtain 1;

Overall value of the portfolio

578.54 565.10

Amount invested Amount invested= = = 37.946 %= = = 62.054 % WeightWeightApple CocaCola 913.27932.31 Overall

value of the portfolio will follow a weighted average. However, this is not the case for standard deviation or variance. To compute the portfolio standard deviation, we need to take into account the covariance between the stocks. The formula is as follows: Portfolio standard deviation = √(w1^2 * σ1^2 + w2^2 * σ2^2 + 2 * w1 * w2 * ρ12) where: - w1 and w2 are the weights of the stocks in the portfolio - σ1 and σ2 are the standard deviations of the stocks - ρ12 is the correlation coefficient between the stocks By considering the covariance, we can capture the diversification effect and obtain a more accurate measure of risk for the portfolio. It is important to note that the portfolio standard deviation will not be a simple weighted average of the individual stock standard deviations. The correlation between the stocks plays a crucial role in determining the overall risk of the portfolio. Therefore, when analyzing the risk of a portfolio, it is necessary to consider the covariance between the stocks and calculate the portfolio standard deviation using the formula mentioned above.

standard deviation will follow this rule [Not correct]

Weighted standard deviation : multiply each standard deviation for the weight of each stock = 62.054 · 3.114 + 37.946 · 0.849 =• 2.254

Error of using the weighted standard deviation :The weighted standard deviation overestimates the standard deviation , the calculated one gives a smaller error

If I simplify, I over estimate the risk (which is lower) 2.254 > 1.948• →Actual ways to compute the standard deviation :

  • [direct]
  • [indirect]

2 2 2 2 0.5Time series of a portfolio returns = 1.997% = 1.948(X σ + 2X X σ + X σ )A B A,B B BA A-- standard deviation of daily return of portfolio in a standard deviation : the square root of the- -period variance

EFFECT OF THE DIVERSIFICATION-- Diversification : the property of the risk (standard deviation of the portfolio) of two stocks or more such as the risk is less the simplecombination of the risks of the stock in the portfolioPutting

together two stock I can end up with a risk that is lower than the weighted average (correlation less than one)
‣- The weighted average of individual standard deviation (20%) diversification means and is present as long as the standard deviation is lessthan 20%, 15,44%
Diversification is the difference between this figure : essence of risk
‣- This property is related to the level of correlation, which justifies this
- What’s the impact of correlation to diversification
If the correlation is one the diversification does not hold no diversification
‣ If it is lower than one : the lower the higher the diversification
Correlation is negative : diversification even higher
Diversification = -1 (extreme case) we can reach an interesting situation starting to risky stocks
Mixing them we can reach a portfolio risk equal to 0•
- What should be the weights to get a portfolio risk equal to 0?
- Diversification means that the volatility or standard deviation of two

stocks is less then the weight average of the standard deviation4 - 25 {chapter10}

While the expected return is the weighted average return, if I increase each single expected return I have a proportional return in the‣ portfolio

This is not true for the standard deviation which increases less than proportionally compared with the increase of each standard‣ deviation

- When does diversification does not work?ρ = 1

When- This happens when the correlation between to stocks is equal to one‣ σ ρ ⋅ σ ⋅ σA,B A,B A Bρ = = ρ = 1 σ = σ ⋅ σwhen , thenA,B A,B A B• σ ⋅ σ σ ⋅ σA B A B

- Compute now the variance of a portfolio of A and B, the formula would be :2 2 2 2VA R(ρ) = X σ + 2X X ⋅ σ σ ⋅ σ + X σ σ σ ⋅ σ, instead of writeA B A,B A B A,B A BB BA A 2(X σ + X σ )

Can be simplified as this can never be equal to

zero since →A A B Bσ σ X X X + X = 1 and are positive and and are both positive or however there is the condition :• A B A B A Bρ = X σ + X σ Since we are in this condition the standard deviation of a portfolio is :- P A A B Bρ = 1 We find that when correlation we are in a condition in which we have a perfect balance‣ A,B The standard deviation of a portfolio, in this case is the weighted average• THE EFFICIENT SET FOR TWO ASSETS-- Standard Deviation of Selected Securities- Correlation 1 Straight line→Increasing the Standard deviation : the relationship between standard deviation of the portfolio and expected return of the portfolio is a‣ straight line Both standard deviation and expected return follow the rule of the linear return (same mathematical rule)• I can increase the risk and accordingly the return in a proportional way (no diversification)• ρ = − 1 Condition where , how much is the variance of the

portfolio?- 2 2 2 2VA R(ρ) = X σ − 2X X ⋅ σ ⋅ σ + X σ σ = − 1 σ ⋅ σ, negative sign since‣ A B A B A,B A BB BA A 2(X σ − X σ )This is the square of the binomial : could be equal to zero, which could happen even tough‣ A A B Bσ σ X Xand are positive and and are both positive• A B A B- It is interesting to notice that this expression can to go zero under some conditionsX σ − X σ = 0‣ A A B BX X = 1 − X X σ − (1 − X )σ = 0Instead of I can write the result is• B B A A A A Bσ σB AX = X =X σ − σ − X σ = 0 X ⋅ (σ + σ ) = σ and→ →- A A B A B A A B B A Bσ + σ σ + σA B A B5 - 25 {chapter10}Example :σ = 10 % = 0.10 σ = 12 % = 0.12Assume andA B Apply the formula and find that :σ σ0.12 0.10AB X = = = 0.4545 =

45.45 %X = = = 0.5454 = 54.54 % BA σ + σ 0.12 + 0.10σ + σ 0.12 + 0.10 A BA B-

In this way I am able to find what are the weights for A and B, which can guarantee that in this special case with correlation equal to - 1 :( )ρ = − 1

The risk of the portfolio is equal to 0 (standard deviation = 0)

‣ My two stocks are risky, but in this way the overall risk is equal to zero

•- Space which represents the relationship between standard deviation of portfolio and expected return of portfolio and when we have twostock : Lies inside this perimeter (triangle), which is given by two extreme cases :ρ = 1 and

‣ ρ = − 1 : two segments, starting from the point that represent each stock (points with zero risk)

‣ ρIn practice is nor one nor minus one, it is between those two extremes

- In more realistic situations, it will follow one of the convex curves

‣ The more convex it is the higher the correlation (closer to the diagonal)ρ = 1

Convex with low correlation ✦ Diversify: increase the risk less than proportionally with respect to the return as long as correlation is not equal to one ✦ Examples: - Correlation Across Securities: Value Stocks, Value Growth - January 1996 - September 2020, June 2012 - September 2020 ✦ Using the data during a long historical period (96 until 2 months ago), the correlation matrix between the Value stocks seen before for S&P 500: - Correlation matrix is symmetric: Berkshire and United 0.56 and vice-versa - In the diagonal there is just a sign (could write 1) ✦ Almost perfect correlation example: Good - Google (almost one) ✦ Analysis: - The correlation between these stocks is, for most cases, well below 0.5 - Few with correlation higher than 0.5 - Never equal to 0 ✦ Analysis of growth stocks: - Google and Goog or Good and Google have correlation almost one (are stocks of the same company) - Has strong correlation also with Amazon - Lower with Microsoft (even though high) - Between

growth companies - the correlation are higher than value

Are in the same sector: Knowledge sector (online activities, intangible assets - most important aspect)

Share common properties: important result

  • Correlation: powerful tool to address how much we can diversify
  • 6 - 25 {chapter10}

Correlation = 1 NO diversification

Dettagli
Publisher
A.A. 2020-2021
115 pagine
3 download
SSD Scienze economiche e statistiche SECS-P/11 Economia degli intermediari finanziari

I contenuti di questa pagina costituiscono rielaborazioni personali del Publisher EMMAMNRT di informazioni apprese con la frequenza delle lezioni di Corporate finance and Financial institutions e studio autonomo di eventuali libri di riferimento in preparazione dell'esame finale o della tesi. Non devono intendersi come materiale ufficiale dell'università Università degli studi Ca' Foscari di Venezia o del prof Rigoni Ugo.