Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
vuoi
o PayPal
tutte le volte che vuoi
SM: Old vs New
Key concern: Production Quality of life
Ideology: Marx, Engel, Luxemburg, Lenin
Less consistent social carrier: Workers
Well-educated sectors of society structure: Real distinction between leaders and followers
Issue time and space
Functions of SM:
- Promote new ideas
- Challenging the elite
- Promote change in society
- Riots/trouble in reaction to unsolved problems
- Attention: the existence of SM is not only justified by the achievement of goals affecting the policy agenda
LESSON 17 - 1.12.2021: THE POLICY MAKING
What is policy making:
- Policies are designed to achieve a specific goal and present solutions to a societal problem
- Public policy: more specific term that refers to the sequence of actions that are undertaken to solve specific societal problems
- They are the main outcome of the political system (Remember Easton)
- Problems are issued that are recognised as problems. Whenever I do understand that my intervention
As a government has an impact on an issue, I recognise that that issue can be solved à it is a problem. We recognise an issue as a problem whenever it can be solved by the human/governmental intervention.
2 typologies of public policies
How can we classify public policies? One typology:
TYPE | DEFINITION |
---|---|
Regulatory policies | Specify conditions and constraints for individual and/or collective behavior |
Distributive p. | New resources to be distributed |
Redistributive p. | Modify the distribution of existing resources |
Constituent p. | Create or modify already existing states' institutions |
The other typology: BENEFITS
Cost | Concentrated | Diffuse |
---|---|---|
Concentrated | Interest groups politics | Entrepreneurial |
Diffuse | Clientelistic (non-normal type of Majoritarian policy making, because it has high costs but benefits only for a small part of the society) |
The models of public policies:
- Institutional
- Formal institutions
- Informal institutions
- Pre-structure policy decisions
- Define both the strategic opportunities and
The constraints in which policy makers operate (resources, …)- Assumption: institutions are the only players of the game à players are the institutions àwe don’t see the influence of SM, citizens are excluded à it is limiting
The models of public policies: rational- Rational players: they make the optimal decision according to decision-makers’ preferences à strong assumption- Bayesian learning concept: we take the solution that prove to be the best from previous or other experience à dichotomy option: 0 = bad = don’t choose it // 1 = good = make that decision- Core Assumptions:61 Presence of perfect information ào Political actors behave rationally ào
The models of public policies: incremental- Realistic description of how decision-makers get to their answer- General stability and incremental change- Possible change deriving from shocks- “Bounded rationality” à limitation of knowledge and cognitive
capacity of decision-makers- "Bounded learning" The models of public policies: groups- Public policies are the results of an equilibrium between different groups- Change in the interest of each group might bring to change The models of public policies: elite- Central role of the elite à electorate as purely informed- Elite shapes public opinion- Elite are the main motor of policy making The policy cycle The agenda setting- Identification of societal problems requiring the state intervention- Political agenda à problems that are selected by decision-makers- Choosing the agenda means power- Core role played by various actors influencing the agenda setting à epistemic community The policy formulation- Definition, discussion, acceptance or rejection of policy problems- Elaboration of alternatives for action- Can have constraints:Substantiveo Proceduralo- Role of scientific experts and advisors in designing policies The policy adoption- Determined by governmentalinstitutions- Party loyalty as fundamental decision-making mechanism- Type of state organization (federal or unitary) affect the speed of adoption- Veto players might play a role in the adoption62The policy implementation- Conversion of laws into practices- 3 different models:
- Top-down models à production of unequivocal policy objectives
- Bottom-up models à bureaucrats at the centre
- Hybrid models à elements of both previous models
- Instruments are vulnerable to potential implementation differences- Type of political system also determines the degree of difficulty in implementing a policy
The policy evaluation- Do the output attain the goals?- Experts who have knowledge about the policy field- Different types of evaluation:
- Formal
- Client satisfaction
- Outcome evaluation
- Cost-benefit evaluation
- Evaluation of long-term consequences
- Core role of policy evaluation à feedbackInstitutions frames and policy styles- Policy making as a strategy to solve societal
Riskinesso - Attention: we are talking about political participation in democracies
The modes of participation
- Single shot participation vs more organized one
- 3 actors are of core importance
- Social movements
- Interest groups
- Political parties
What drives political participation
(family market).
Many types of participation and Political participation as a choice of last resort
Participation to bring about decision concerning public goods by participating people—increase both public and private good paradox of collective action (Olson 1965)
Which is the core "problem" with Olson's definition of collective action paradox?
The macro-level: from regime type to participation
Democracies wide range of participatory acts—
Authoritarian regimes executive beyond democratic accountability but tolerates some forms of participation
Repressive despotic regimes repressing political participation and imposing political participation (non-spontaneous)
The macro-level:
Participation within democracies
Participation varies within regime types
Participation increases with a higher economic welfare of the reference state
Participation relates also to the party system that we might find in a country
Main type of political participation in democracies
The macro-level: voting
Compulsory voting increases participation
The electoral system matters a lot
Registration methods
Timing of elections
The macro-level: labor union membership
Many factors shape participation to unions:
- Degree of transition of a country (agriculture to industry)
- Type of present political regime
- The Ghent system institutional incentive. Government delegates the management of unemployment insurance to labour unions
The micro-level: why people engage differently?
Individual traits:
- Resources
- Recruitment
- Social network
- Orientation
- Contextual cues
The micro-level: resources
- Socio-economic skills and endowments
- Availability of time
- Education
- Involvement in civic
activities likeminded effect
The micro-level: recruitment
- Association involvement
- Work connected issues:
- Availability of free time
- Work-space organization
- Class and group milieux as booster for organization
The micro-level: social network
- At the crossroad between association and socio-economic resources:
- Role of the family
- Role of the network outside of the family:
- Real
- Virtual
The micro-level: orientation and contextual cues
- Organization of more or less complex ideologies
- Some contextual cues
Micro-levels network pushes for participation
Meso level existence of large organization
Macro level democratic institutions
Macro level nature of party systems
Attention: these factors might interact pushing for higher degree of participation
LESSON 19 – 10.1.2022
SUPPORTING DEMOCRACY. WHAT DOES IT MEAN AND HOW IT WORKS
A brief intro into democratic support
- Democracies as feature of the world (80s 2005)
Since the 80s (end of the cold war, end of the Stalinism dictatorship,
(post-colonialism) → democracy's support and promotion- Democratic promotion as a paradox imposition of democracy (intervention of the →USA, imposition for France)- Limits to democratic promotion a democracy should be based on its own principles. If →we impose democracy, will it survive? What would happen?Active vs passive democratic support- Active support intentional and deliberate actions undertaken to support →democracy (social movements, interest groups, organizations like the EU, ONU)- Passive support understand how democracies evolve (trends) and how they are →influenced (internal and external)Non-intentional but can be influenced:o Spillover↓ Demonstration effect↓ Democratization by emulation↓ Contagion↓Direct vs indirect democratic support- International side (so the active one)- Direct support targets some core characteristics of democracies↓- Indirect support targets the conditions for democratization (what makes it possible →and how it happens)-
ng in education and healthcare, and promoting equal opportunities for all citizens are key factors in achieving economic well-being. A strong democracy ensures that the government is accountable to its people and makes decisions that benefit the entire population. By investing in education and healthcare, a country can develop a skilled workforce and improve the overall health and productivity of its citizens. Additionally, promoting equal opportunities for all citizens, regardless of their background or social status, helps to reduce inequality and create a more inclusive society. Therefore, a sound democracy is essential for the economic well-being of a country.