Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
vuoi
o PayPal
tutte le volte che vuoi
ALWAYS MAN THAT WERE VERY KEEN ON THEIR LOOKS — SOMETIMES A TARGET OF
ADMIRATION; MORE OFTEN A TARGET OF LAUGH]… But dandyism as a social, even
political phenomenon…was the invention of the Regency, when aristocracy and
monarchy were more widely despised (hence more nastily exclusive) than ever before
or since in English history [THE DANDY WAS A PRODUCT OF REGENCY, AND REGENCY
WAS A PERIOD WHEN THE STATUS OF ARISTOCRACY AND THE MONARCHY WERE
DEBATED, CRITICISED THAN NEVER BEFORE]. What the utilitarian middle class most
hated in the nobility was what the court most worshipped in the dandy [THE DANDY
HAD THOSE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE NOBILITY WHICH WERE HATED BY MIDDLE-
CLASSES AND WHICH WERE LOVED ESPECIALLY BY THE PRINCE REGENT] -- a
creature perfect in externals and careless of anything below the surface, a man
dedicated solely to his own perfection through a ritual of taste [A MAN DEDICATES
ONLY TO HIS OWN PERFECTION Through A RITUAL OF TASTE]. The epitome of selfish
irresponsibility, he was ideally free of all human commitments that conflict with taste:
passions, moralities, ambitions, politics or occupations [THE ONLY THING THAT
COUNTS FOR HIM WAS HIMSELF, HIS LOOK, HIS WELL-BEING: Extremely
CARELESS] ...a Hero so evidently at the centre of the stage that he need do nothing
to prove his heroism — never need, in fact, do anything at all [THE DANDY IS THE
EXACT OPPOSITE OF THE MIDDLE-CLASSES, HE TAKE CARE OF HIS OWN LOOK].
The 18th century fop…or “macaroni”
The 18th fop (negative term) was called also macaroni, a fashionable young man,
who dressed and often even spoke in a usual, effected way. He was very fastidious in
terms of clothes and also in terms of eating (he ate a lot of pasta that at the time was
so elite). He spoke using many French terms and wrote poems also with sort
of macaronic Latin and English. So he was a target of regency satire.
The macaroni is the precursor of the dandy, but they aren't to be confused. The
macaroni is a feminine while the quintessential regency dandy was a sort of virile,
masculine reaction to this effimenincy.
The first “real” dandy: George Brummell(“Beau” Brummell)
Brummell wasn't an aristocrat: he didn't belong to any of the grand aristocratic family,
he had no land, no coat of arms (“stemma di famiglia”) or such other things. And yet
he dictated the fashion, he was the ultimate arbiter of fashion in his time. He was a
friend of the Prince Regent, and he was apparently a charismatic man.
SLIDE 5_BRUMMELL
Brummell was quite different from previous versions of the fop, of the very elegant,
fine young man, particularly the 18th century manifestation of this typology of human
being — the fop, the macaroni. They are contemporaries because they used the collar.
Their clothes are coloured while our men are very severe nowadays.
George Brian Brummell (1778-1840)
“There are three great men of our age: myself, Napoleon and Brummell. But of we
three, the greatest of all is Brummell.” (Byron) — Bryon had a large ego. Having to
choose between Napoleon and Brummell, he chooses Brummell who is the greatest of
the mall, because he didn't do anything, and he still manages to have an impact on
his generation. Napoleon had done so much, but Brummell showed had just showed
himself to the world.
“[he was] a nobody, who made himself somebody, and gave the law to everybody”
(Mrs Gore) — She was more critical of the regency period. He was nobody because he
had no blood, but he decided what people should look like to be accepted in society.
Brummell was much talked and written about.
There are lots of characters inspired by Brummell by the literature of the time. Many
avatars of Brummell. In “The Young Duke”, there is one character at least,
called Anslie, who is reminiscent of Brummell. He is the superfine in society.
In “Pelham”, there is Mr. R... who was actually modelled very closely on the elderly
Brummell. Pelham goes to France, and when he comes back to England he stops
in Caley? To meet Brummell, who was in exile there.
As soon as he left England, Brummell had inspired lots of written comments on
himself. Collections of witticism, written by someone imitating his style, circulated
very soon. He became popular also in France (Balzac, Boudlaire they all wrote and
mentioned him). Interest in this charismatic figure carried on to the later time; even
Virginia Woolf wrote one essay about Brummell.
Life
He was a commoner, that means he wasn't an aristocrat and didn't belong to the
great aristocratic families of the Nation. He came from a family of the middling ranks
(middle-class comes a bit later that the late 18th century. Was a varied social group
— included people who worked in trade: merchant, shopkeepers...). His father was
employed by the State, so he was a civil servant.
His parents decided to sent him to Eton and Oxford. If they had been merchant they
wouldn't have choose this type of school, because they wouldn't been aware that he
might have been corrupted by the aristocrats who attending Eaton and Oxford.
He was, even at school, he acquired a reputation for fashion, for being very sensitive
of fashion and a very young man of taste.
(Vivian Gray: the very first part. He was very precursory interested in his look, which
suggest that he was fashioning himself in a way on drawing inspiration from this
myths of Brummell).
People went to university much earlier than nowadays, in fact he left Oxford when he
was 16 (he didn't complete his studies).
Brummell was a friend of the Prince of Wales (before he became the Prince Regent),
who was interested in art, fashion and beauty. The young Brummell joined the
fashionable regiment.
The military career was especially popular (as commissioner officer) among the
aristocrats. The firstborn would become the Lord, the Peer, and the other children
would often enter the army. The particular regiment he entered was the Prince own
Command (the prince was the main officer in that regiment).
These particular regiment, accompanied the Prince of Wales all over the place (they
were all fashionable, all very elegant young men that didn't fight).
He stayed in the Regiment for a while, and he resigns from his post in the army in
1798 and took a house in London. Here he ha d already made the name as a very
fashionable young man, so he was immediately admitted to all the
most exclusive clubs of London. Clubs were men institutions; certain clubs were
very exclusive.
As a very fashionable well-connected young man he was quite rich, belong to a
wealthy family (not so rich as he would have liked). He spent more money than he
had actually at his disposal and as many young belonging to aristocracy did in those
days, he lived on credit (shopkeepers, servant, tailors...would be quite willing to sell
him things or services imagining that sooner or later he would have paid them back).
In the early years of the 19th century (actually before the actual Regent 1811), he
became an arbiter of fashion: not only he was very elegant, but he was enough to be
criticised or ?praised? by him to be disqualified or qualified to join certain elite circle.
He even manage for a while to change the style of cloths of the Prince of Wales
himself. The Prince used to dress in a very ?flashy?, vulgar and too colourful way.
1811 he quarrelled with the Prince Regent. There are lot of different stories circulating
about this, perhaps he was too arrogant or perhaps when the Prince became the
Prince Regent he felt he had to turn a new page in his life, not to have so many
contacts with his previous friends.
Brummell kept on living in London for some years, and he changed a bit his lifestyle;
he couldn't be at court so often, but he was still very much liked and feared? He
attend the clubs, gambled heavily and run into debt. Now that he was no longer a
special friend of the Prince of Wales shopkeepers maybe were no so willing to sell
things on credits: so life started to be difficult for him.
In 1816, he run away, escaped from his creditors and when to France. At the time
there was special prison for people who were in debts (debtors prison). The peers of
the realm (the great aristocrats) were extent from this: they could run huge debts,
without being imprisoned. One of the privileges of the aristocracy — applied only to
the peers not to all the relatives.
He lived in France till 1840: the death after his gradual long decline. At the beginning
he was still famous and popular and elegant...and so people like Pelham in the novel
used to goes and visiting. Gradually there was a change, and he became poor, he
couldn't keep up his elegance and everything was connecting with the edging and
poverty.
The paradox of the dandy
The dandy was a very paradoxical creation of these times.
On the one hand his own figure and the idea of the superfine man, is an emphatic
affirmation of the aristocratic principles of the idea of exclusiveness (even more
exclusive because not the all aristocrats would rate as up to standard in Brummell
eyes) and leisure (crucial in these aristocrats lifestyles. They have nothing to do, they
didn't have an occupation: spent money and plan your time. Also, Brummell started
with the army but as soon as possible he decided to give it up because he didn't like
to have an occupation).
On the other hand is a very subversive character if you think about it, because he
wasn't at all recognised as a member of the elite: he made his way into the elite.
He was the living proof, the evidence that gentile birth wasn't enough to qualify as a
real gentleman. He had no title (not an Earl, Marques...not even a Baronet), no coat
of arms, no courage, no big house in the country (no ancetral-hall; in fact he had no
noble ancestral at all): he was completely different. What's made for his charm and
charisma was something very difficult to define and describe, what the France would
say a certain je-ne-sais-quoi (his taste basically, that is inborn in the human being).
Elegance for him was what matter. He was very critical of country baronet, people
who spend lot of time hunting or even on horse back, because they used to be not so
tidy, clean, dirty boots...he had a very particular idea of what gentleman should be,
very much focused on the surface, on the appearance.
Brummell was a product of the Romantic age, but wasn't a “romantic” character.
Stendhal was influenced by the dandy, Brummell, especially in “Le rouge et le noir”.
He thought “To seem sorrowful is not in good taste: You’re supposed to seem bored.”
— the dandy isn't passionate, he is never the victim of his own emotion, he is cool,
deliberate, non-introspective: he is artifical, and he prides in being artificial. He also
hides, because its aim at appearing natural, but in fact he would the product of much
self-training. It comes a very