Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
vuoi
o PayPal
tutte le volte che vuoi
REPORT QUALITY
For report quality we need accuracy, balance, clarity, comparability, reliability, timeliness.
RESOURCE INDICATORS
Indicators of resource state aims at capturing potentialities for enterprise to innovate and grow. They cover both tangible and intangible assets. The objective is finding those resources that make the company sustainable in the long run. There are four types of resources:
- Financial
- Technological
- Human and organizational
- Image and reputation
But this categorization is not mandatory, so depending on the company the indicators could differ (for example, B2C focus on customer relations). In general, with indicators of the state of resources, it is necessary to:
- Identify critical resources for the company
- Select the right indicators to analyze the resources focusing on:
- Quality of resources available
- Quantity of resources available
- Accessibility of resources available
Aside you can see an example. So for example, technological resources could...
be monitored:- from a qualitative point of view by looking at the returns generated by patents,
- from a quantitative point of view the incidence of new product sale,
- from an accessibility point of view the partnership with research centers.
Key Performance Indicators (KPI) is a term used with indicators that deal with current performance, the aim is spot some weak signals in order to anticipate the possible problem that will arise. For example, we use KPIs to discover that we have a high defect rate, this probably in the future will be translated in high return cost or lower revenues due to remanufacturing. So KPIs detect current performance (weak signals) to anticipate the future.
The concept of Key Risk Indicators (KRI) is related but different to KPIs because the KRI spot even
weaker signal before that in the future will probably become a problem. For example, a high number of payable could lead the Business Unit to cash shortage in the future so when we see that the payables are arising, we can ask to the Business Unit to take actions. In this case we used the payables as a KRI. Another example of KRI is monitor the GDP of some developed countries to understand if our business could run there. Another KRI is the Value At Risk (VAR) that represent the probability of the maximum potential loss in an investment. Generally it's expressed in terms of 99% or 95% probability of losing up to a sum x of an investment after a certain amount of time. So we have KRIs for internal process and resources, external context and potential loss. IN SUMMARY: KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: Non-financial indicators could introduce the problem of SATURATION EFFECT meaning that after a while, improve more and more the non-financial indicators doesn't imply a value creation becausewe reached the saturation level (as it possible to see from the image). Remembers that to support decision the AFC tools should have the following requirements, and regarding KPIs we know that:- Completeness depends on the number of chosen indicators meaning that should be enough and a weighted system to weight the importance of each one should be introduced. The weighting system could be implicit if we do not want to let employees know what are our priority; or could be an explicit weighting system association to each indicator an explicit weight in order to let the company create value upon them. The objective is to always have a linear relationship between value drivers and value creation putting effort in what still give value.
- Measurability is good
- Long term orientation is good because the indicators are selected in order to monitor value drivers.
- Timeliness is good because the focus is on non-financial performances, so eliminating the extra time to transform
- Specific responsibilities are good for operational level but not for higher ones because it's difficult evaluate CFO or CEO with these indicators
- Precision is good because there is the link between the value creation and the indicator.
13 PROJECT WORK PILLS: DASHBOARDS
To have a fully overview of company's performance, it is necessary to mix indicators that belong to different families to match strength and weaknesses of different measures. All the three types have advantages and disadvantage. Remember that we have:
- Accounting based indicators also called financial indicators, are the indicators used to perform a financial analysis.
- Value based indicator: DCF techniques, relative valuation and value based proxies
- Value driver: c'è il capitolo che si chiama value driver
And we need to build a good PMS with a mix of indicators. This is the idea of Dashboards they are a set of indicators selected to reflect the
Key performances of a company. Balance scorecards is the most famous type of dashboard and for this reason, even though the balance scorecard is just a type of dashboard, people are used to use the term "balance scorecard" to refers to dashboards. (Penso che indicator scorecards sia equivalente a dashboard) This situation has led several enterprises to build "indicators scorecards", that are groups of different type of indicators that together can answer to all the managerial needs.
Constructing indicators scorecards needs:
- Defining the dashboard format
- Defining the process by which different measures are selected
We will focus on the most used type of dashboard which is the balanced scorecards.
BALANCED SCORECARDS:
The Balanced Scorecard is a set of indicators selected to reflect the key performances of a company. Are divided into four sections that are connected by the vision and the strategy of the company (the starting point). The set of 4 indicators is
- Financial Perspective: are key figures about the financial performance of the company, there are indicators about profitability, liquidity, market size… In general, is a set that aim to provide a representation of the key financial numbers of the organization.
- Customer: the aim is to collect indicators to understand how the company is seen by the customers so customer satisfaction level, external defect rate, time to market, market quota… These indicators are customer/market oriented.
- Internal processes: The indicators analyze how processes are run by the company for example lead time, production costs, internal defect rate, cost of raw materials...
- Learning and growth: There are typically indicators of the state of resources, that allow to understand the ability of the organization to be sustainable in the future: of image, of reputation, of investment, of composition of HR, of quality of HR, of the network of partners, of patents,
of how much the company is investing in innovation...These four perspectives reflect the ability of the company to create value. The financial perspective monitors revenue and cost and the relative financial effect (accounting based indicators). Then customer perspective focuses on how revenues are generated. Then internal process to analyze how processes are run by the company. Learning and growth perspective looks at indicators of the state of resources that usually aims to explain the Terminal Value. The perspectives are the drivers of the Shareholders Value and this explains the fact that the selection of these indicators is guided by the strategy and the vision of the company. To select indicators, it is necessary to move from the strategy of the company.
BALANCED SCORECARDS AREAS:
approaches: the balanced approach and the causal approach. The balanced approach focuses on selecting indicators from each perspective (financial, customer, internal process, learning and growth) to create a balanced scorecard. This approach ensures that all aspects of the business are considered and measured. The causal approach, on the other hand, focuses on selecting indicators that directly cause or influence the desired outcomes. This approach is more focused and aims to identify the key drivers of success. Both approaches have their merits and drawbacks, and the choice between them depends on the specific needs and goals of the company. In conclusion, the selection of indicators for a balanced scorecard should be guided by the company's strategy, taking into account both the balanced and causal approaches.streams in the literature:BALANCE IS KEY: Here they said that the key point in selecting the indicators is give equal relevance to all the four perspectives.
CAUSALITY IS THE KEY: Here we start from an objective and we select the indicators that help us to achieve that objective. So the final result will look like a strategic map because different indicators work together to achieve the target.
In general, to develop the scorecard is necessary to define the objectives and then to assign to each of them the indicators. The steps are:
• STRATEGY MAP: connect the objective to different perspective of the balance scorecard. The objective has to be calculated into the 4 perspectives
• Associate to each objective the indicator, designing appropriate measures.
• To each indicator it is necessary to associate a quantitative goal or target that the company should achieve.
OTHER TYPES OF SCORECARDS: There are many other different types of scorecards, we will see:
TABLEAU du BORD (TdB): is theVersione francese del balanced scorecard introdotta prima della formalizzazione del balanced scorecard. La differenza sta nella costruzione: - Partiamo dagli obiettivi dell'azienda e poi li traduciamo in Fattori Critici di Successo (CSF) - Ogni CSF è poi associato a uno o più indicatori di performance - Gli obiettivi aziendali vengono scomposti a livello di Business Unit e poi all'interno delle unità organizzative all'interno delle BU Il TdB è un framework più libero rispetto al balanced scorecard (BSC) e nel BSC ci sono più indicatori finanziari mentre nel TdB ce ne sono di più non finanziari. Tuttavia, entrambi condividono il fatto che la strategia dovrebbe guidare la scelta degli indicatori. SKANDIA NAVIGATOR: Questa è la versione svedese del Balanced Scorecard. Ci sono quattro prospettive simili a quelle del BSC: Focus sul cliente, Focus sui processi, Focus sul rinnovamento e sviluppo. L'idea è quella di collegare