vuoi
o PayPal
tutte le volte che vuoi
Referring to present work present, past or present perfect
Meta-discourse present or future (to express conclusions)
High use of non-finite tenses: infinite, -ing form and past participle
Use of the passive: the passive is very used in specialized discourse. But in legal texts there’s
a lower proportion of passive forms
Depersonalisation: the use of non-human subjects and the reduction of any direct reference
to the interlocutor
4) Textual features
Anaphoric reference: to increase textual cohesion. But in legal discourse they repeats words
rather than use anaphoric reference, to avoid misunderstanding
Use of conjunctions: to increase textual cohesion and for a pragmatic function. In legal
discourse: rather than using short forms, they use long forms, which contain a noun
Thematic sequence: the theme is generally the subject of the sentence and occurs initially
Standard thematic sequence: the rheme of a sentence becomes the theme of the
following sentence and so on
Parallel thematic sequence: the same theme is repeated in several sequences
Text genre: each community has its own genre, specialized genres have codified and
standardized forms. Subgenre: different categories of a genre
Textual organisation: 2 main models of textual structure:
CARS: three moves, divided in several steps (establishing a territory, establishing a
niche and occupying the niche)
Model divided in macroacts (observation, analysis and problem deduction) and
microacts
Speech acts: pragmatic aspect of a language . The most frequent in legal language is
performative speech acts (wills, statements of guilt…), there are specific formula
Argumentative pattern: argumentation is when a specialist tries to convince their readers
that his thesis is the right one. Language is neutral and objective even if it has a persuasive
purpose.
5) The formation of the lexis of computer science: it is a new branch, so it has new concept
and new tools: it has developed its own terminology. How?
Borrowings: both from general language and other specialized fields
Specialization (hardware, disk…) American spelling
Use of metaphors (memory, mouse, menu…) they became independent words
Neology: new words created for the purpose (byte)
Derivation: prefixes and suffixes (kilobyte, debug, processor…)
Analogy: a new term is formed by being modelled on an existing one (software)
The use of similes: to coin new expressions which refer to the aspect of an item
(banana plug)
The process of compounding: the compression of various items, often omitting linking
function words (computer programmer, on-line…) or blending the various elements
into single words (bit, modem, pixel…)
Colloquialism (pixel, bug…)
Acronyms: because they are short (RAM), they suggest a certain meaning (EDIT), they
resemble real word , with the addition of extra letters (ALGOL)
Abbreviation (FAQ)
Recent developments: the first terms were created with these processes (external resources),
but now the new terms invented are created on the already existing terms in computer
language, by:
Suffixes: -er, -ing , -ie (emailer, netwriting, nettie…)
Prefixes: re- (reemailer)
Analogy (offline from online)
Derivation (internaute, cybernaute…) cyber more productive than info
6) Keynes’s “General Theory” : it has different characteristics from the normal rules of economic
discourse:
Subjectivity in the use of terminology: Keynes violates the principle of monorefentiality:
terms may refer to different concepts or two different terms for the same concept
Authorial presence: he violates the principle of depersonalisation: presence of the first-
person pronoun
Argumentative strategies: the text isn’t sequential:
there are a lot of cross-references to other parts of the book
He adds digressions
For some argumentations he uses insights (following the principle of
depersonalization)
Emotional involvement: figurative and emotive language is often employed (to cause a
conflict, a controversy)
Irony (lexical items with strong emotional load, or taken from incongruous semantic
fields, or marked by the use of intensifying premodifiers)
Reinforcement of a term by a synonym or a related term
Contrasts
Metaphors
Reader involvement: the reader has an active role th
7) The development of specialized discourse in the 17 century
Revolution of the approach of studies: from scholastic to empirical
Revolution in the language used by science
Bacon: he was the first who said that scientific language needed a change
Direct link should be established between reality observed and verbal expression
Words are expressions of things priority must be given to reality over language
Lots of terms used before had to be revised
Critics towards the scientific language used before:
language was detached from the physically reality to which it referred (Bacon)
most words were polysemy and this made texts ambiguous (Boyle)
the English language was “imperfect”, because it had a limited amount of
specialized vocabulary when they began to write in English and not in Latin, they
found a lot of difficulties
Development in the lexis of scientific English:
Specialization of already existing words (gravity(
Borrowing of terms from other languages and their adaptation to the morphological
features of the English language (-atio -ation)
Borrowing of affixes (-ology, -meter)
The opaqueness of language: new language was too difficult criticism of too many Latin
expressions
The transparency of language: they adopt also other criteria: the creation of terms in a way
that their form reflected the concept to which they referred (saywhat, yeasay)
Conciseness of the language: sentences had to be more concise as possible, without
unnecessary details: no connotation or indirect meaning (monoreferentiality), no
metaphors, no eloquence, no figurative speech and stylist embellishment they had a
negative influence on society
The evolution of the syntax of scientific English: the syntactic features used today born in
this period: structure (noun phrase + verb + noun phrase), nominalization and
depersonalization
8) Specialized discourse in the “Philosophical Transaction”
The Royal Society (founded in 1662)
Communal correspondence Henry Oldenburg
The minutes of Royal Society
Early scientific publication: born of scientific journals (“Les Journal des Savants” and “ The
Philosophical Transaction” in 1665)
Features of the PT:
Aims: spread of scientific news within the Royal Society and also other specialists,
not only British but of all Europe + to arouse the interest of new minds in specialized
matter
Editorial role: Oldenburg collected the new, the letters of scientists, the articles…and
ordered them in the journal, sometimes with elimination of parts, short summaries,
introductions…he often translated the texts in Latin.
Text types: there were a lot of text types, whose forms weren’t codified and
conventional. We can divide them in four groups:
- news items: informative documents which reported observation of facts, reports,
directions of practical use, descriptions of curious fact or beings … technical terms
were used and the style was very polite
- experimental accounts: specialists not only described an observation of facts (use
of the passive form), but they told what they had experimented and discovered (use
of the active form, I/we subjects) very detailed and ordered chronologically.
Sometimes there were disputes but they were very polite and civil.
- letters: they were critic exchanges between specialists. Sometimes only an extract
was printed, because they were too long. They had a salutation part and they used
st nd
1 and 2 person (≠ news items and experimental accounts).
- book reviews: they weren’t very frequent, they consisted in summary of the book
and a little evaluation of the reviewer
Conclusions: also other types of journals were produced: discipline-related, publications
devoted to a specific genre, popular journals…
9) The origins of the Experimental Essay: it’s a result of the new approach of studies