Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
Scarica il documento per vederlo tutto.
vuoi
o PayPal
tutte le volte che vuoi
FCA UK
Ecc... These authorities are specialized (Banca d'Italia for banking system and Consob for capital markets) and are independent. Independence No institutional arrangements through which these authorities should report to the government. They do not have a formal obligation to report to the government and for this reason the government is interested to the chairman, there would be less clashes and contradictions. Independence is an institutional quality rather than an absolute feature. The reason to have this kind of authorities allows to prevent externalities and at the same time they are specialized and quick and write the laws very quickly and efficiently.
Problems related to this model:
Concentration of powers:
- Strong division of power in government:
- Legislative Parliament.
- Judicial Court system.
- Apply the law and manage the public administration Government.
If all the powers are in a single person, I can abuse the power as an executive. If the powers are splitted
in different persons the holders of other powers can control me. Diversifying powers reduce risk. Supervisory authorities have concentrated powers when typically, government has powers splitted into branches. Due process The fair trial: you do not want to be judged by the same institution that brought the case against you because you lose impartiality. Democratic Issue: The Parliament says to avoid bad externalities banks should have a certain amount of money, who decides what amount? This decision is delegated from the Parliament to a supervisory authority to write a delegate rule, so the Parliament writes the standard and the supervisory authority writes the rule Supervisory authorities are specialized. The decision of the appropriate capital for prudential requirements is a technical decision but it depends if you are in a recession or expansion phase so this technical decision has also political implications, where distributive justices' effects. In a normal democracy a decisionwith political implications means political responsibility The Government can decide whatever it wants. If decisions of the government are not liked by the citizens the members of the Parliament would be punished through people voting power. The power of the Government is balanced by the political responsibility Spiderman Rule: No power without responsibility. Supervisory Authorities do not take responsibilities because they are not elected, this is a big violation of the Spiderman rule Democratic Issue. If I have a problem with a professor's mark, I can claim to the deem which is the superior authority. If the professor is the one who pushed for the election of the deem, he won't be tough with the professor. Going to the superior authority needs the authority to be independent enough and capable. When there is an abuse of power you can go to the superior authority and claim, this is what you can do when you are under a supervisory authority, you can go to the judge. In any case the
supervisory authorities are supposed to act respecting the law and it can bounder them, furthermore supervisory authorities are subject to the public scrutiny. The lack of political responsibility can be compensated by the democratic process. In this case we have through the public consultation we have something allowing the decision process to have democratic flavor. When a supervisory authority decides to use the power of law making delegated by the parliament they are supposed to go through a public consultation through the market and the reason is that by doing so the supervisory authority gets a democratic legitimation which compensate for the lack of political responsibility. The consultation with the market is the typical way through which the delegated law power is democratically checked, a control ex post maybe very problematic. Supervisory authorities are the expert so the ex post control cannot function, the supervisory authorities are specialized so their decision would be taken as thebest possible.(Remember the mandatory reading).
Once we have the public consultation with the market, the lobbies will try to influence the lawmakers.
Which are the jobs of these authorities?
BaFin (German authority) Used to be in charge for everything, was the single supervisor for both issues of stability and disclosure.
Other authorities are expression of different model The Twin Peaks' Model: two different authorities with two different goals.
Bank of Italy cares for the issue of stability.
Consob cares about how intermediaries conduct.
What is the reason for a twin peaks' model?
They may be conflicting each other.
If you go for stability, you do not like disclosure too much and vice versa.
Stability and transparency are competing purposes, if you give all the supervisory power to a single entity, you will have one goal overcoming the other; if you split the power to two authorities maybe they will clash but the final outcome will be more balanced.
This model allows more
Specialization and commitment to the goal of the single institution. The Twin peaks' Model may duplicate the cost of compliance.
The EU origin of the financial regulation. The European Union. It is something unique because it is something between the United Nations and the United States of America. UN International organization. US Federal State. Example: Russia invades Ukraine and the UN voted against this invasion. This did not work. Imagine that instead the governor of Illinois thinks that raising interest rates is no good and the governor of Texas thinks it is good. Who takes the decision? The governor of the Central Bank without taking into consideration their opinion. What is the difference? In a Federal State, the members delegate part of their power to a different entity (Illinois and Texas gave up their power over monetary policy to the Federal State, therefore to the Fed). In a Federal State, there is sovereignty, which is the power of a single State over its territory and people living on.
the territory. In the Federal State there is the delegation of sovereignty from the States participating to the Federal State to a different entity which is the Federal State whereas in a National Organization there is a group of people deciding among them something without giving up their sovereignty, so if someone disagrees with the resolution of the United Nations there is nothing to do because there is no delegation of power.
International Organizations Form of Intergovernmentalism Relationship among governments.
Federal State Supra Nationalism Something over the States belonging to the entity.
The EU is something in the middle, this is why it is unique.
The EU is an International Organization but with some features of a Federal State even though these features are much less than a full Federal State.
This is a working process, the EU in the intention of some states is going more and more towards a Federal State while anti EU people think it shouldn’t.
If this is the case there is
a tool which allow the states members of the Eu to delegate some of their sovereignty to the EU, the tool is a Treaty. The Treaties of the European Union and The Treaties of the Functioning of the European Union. The Treaty of Lisbon updates the first two Treaties. The Treaties are the tool trough which a member state delegates its sovereignty to the EU. To identify which are the powers delegate form the states to the Union you should see which kind of powers are conferred / attributed through the treaties to the Union. Only the competences delegated through the treaties are the one delegated. Example: Monetary Policy Power Decided by the ECB The Union acts within the limits of the competence. Poland did not give up its monetary policy because it did not adopt the Euro so part of the Eurozone. Competences not conferred to the Union remain with the Member States. There is one rule and one exception: Rule The competence are with the Member States. Exception The competences are conferred tothe European Union. This is why the EU is closer to the UN. When competences are given up, this giving up can be: Exclusive: The Union has the competence and the States do not. Monetary Economy, Competition... Shared: Both with the State and the European Union, when the EU takes a step, the States should step back. Is there a possibility for the EU to step in limitless? We need some reasons and justifications for the possibility for the Union to step in. The most important shared competence within the Union is the Internal Market. Internal Market: It is the idea that throughout the member of the Union, there is a single market, no barriers, no customs, and no customs duties. Subsidiarity: The Union cannot always step in limitless. The Union steps in when the States are not able to pursue the objectives of the Union. Final Point: The Union is an International Organization featuring both Intergovernmentalism and Supranationalism, mostly Intergovernmentalism but is a working process. The SupraNationalist features, the competences are delegated to the Union are identified through the treaties. The rule is that the competences are with the State and the exception is that they are with the Union. The competence with the Union can be exclusive (e.g., Monetary Policy in the Euro Zone) or shared (Internal Market); in case of shared competence the principle of Subsidiarity governs when the Union can step in. The Union can step in only if the objectives of an action of the Union can be reached at the Union level much better than at other Members States' level.
One more point: Once we have identified the competences, how actually the laws of the European Union are made?
Legislative process
Ursula Von Der Leyen President of the European Commission.
European Commission There is a commissioner for each country and each commissioner is in charge for a certain field of the competencies of the Union. The defense, for example, is not a competence of the Union so there is no commissioner.
Mc
Guinness Commissioner of a division of the commission for the Financial and Banking Sector. In this case the commission takes the first step of a proposal, which is discussed by the Parliament and the Council of the European Union. In Italy for a law to be made you have possibly the cabinet of ministries proposing a law and the cabinet discussing it. In the European Union we have the Commission proposing a law and then the Law Proposal is discussed by the Parliament and the Council of the European Union.