Concetti Chiave
- Coketown is depicted as a polluted, chaotic industrial town where red bricks have turned black due to smoke, emphasizing danger and disorder.
- The industrialization process is harshly criticized through imagery comparing machinery to jungle dangers, highlighting war, chaos, and potential harm.
- Monotony pervades Coketown with identical streets and buildings, symbolizing a loss of individuality among its inhabitants.
- The narrative contrasts the dirty, polluted lives of the lower classes with the comforts and elegance of the upper class, showcasing Victorian hypocrisy.
- Education in Coketown is criticized as stifling children's development, turning them into fact-filled machines rather than nurturing intelligence and personality.
Coketown
This extract deals with the description of the industrial centre Coketown, where the whole story is set and where Mr Gradgrind and his friend Mr Bounderby are now walking.
This town is considered a triumph of facts, it is a town of red bricks, which are not red anymore because of the smoke and pollution which has made them black, they are compared to the painted face of a savage, that gives the idea of danger and chaos. It's also a town of tall chimneys and machinery out of which serpents of smoke come out, image which conveys the idea of a very polluted town.
These three images add an even gloomier touch to the description of the city, which is composed by many streets, either large or small, but all of them looked the same, moreover the buildings looked all the same and even though they were made of red bricks, they turned black because of pollution, just like the canal's water turned purple. This description is gloomy also because of the rich and vivid imagery used. Everything in Coketown is based on facts and look alike: there is no difference between a jail, an hospital and a town-hall, all the buildings are square, made of red bricks painted black and white, which gives a sense of monotony.
In Coketown people are alienated, they all live in the same houses, walk the same streets at the same time, work in the same place and do the same things everyday.
According to the narrator's description, the inhabitants' expression and way of living communicate the monotony and sadness of life in this town. People have lost their personality and individuality: they are equally like one another and look like machines. The first part of the description is based on the lower classes, while the second part is based on the comforts of the upper ones. Indeed, in the first part it deals with pollution and dirt, while in the second one it deals with the comforts and elegancies of life, which gives an idea of the well-off life conditions opposed to the exploitation and precarious ones of the lower class. The narrator focuses on the indifference and contempt of the upper class towards the lower one, indeed he states that fine ladies couldn't even bear to hear the place mentioned. This is an example of Victorian compromise, which shows a hypocritic and superficial attitude, indeed the life of those who bought the goods becomes more comfortable and elegant, while both Coketown and its people don't look so.
All of these characteristics are showed by the repetition of “same”, “like one another”, and “fact”. This last word is crucial: indeed even the school M'Choakumchild is based on facts, its name is a pun because it sounds like “choke the child”, and the verb to choke refers to the children's intelligence. Education should help children to develop their intelligence and personality, but in this case it has the opposite function, its aim is to make machines full of facts out of children.
The narrator is a third person, omniscient and obtrusive one, indeed he stops the narration in order to make personal comments, like in line 35 he states that people doesn't get on well through a rhetorical question, which introduces the critics that the upper classes make towards the poor, who are accused of always getting drunk and taking opium, eating prime parts of meat, fresh butter, mocha coffee and live upon the best. The narrator here is conveying critics about the poor in an hyperbolic way, indeed it is obvious that he's talking about the rich.
Domande da interrogazione
- Qual è l'immagine principale che il testo utilizza per descrivere Coketown?
- Come viene rappresentata la vita degli abitanti di Coketown?
- Qual è la critica principale rivolta all'industrializzazione nel testo?
- In che modo il testo evidenzia la differenza tra le classi sociali a Coketown?
- Qual è il ruolo dell'educazione a Coketown secondo il testo?
Il testo utilizza immagini di mattoni rossi anneriti dal fumo e dall'inquinamento, camini alti e macchinari da cui escono serpenti di fumo, paragonando i pistoni delle fabbriche alla testa di un elefante impazzito, per trasmettere un'idea di pericolo e caos.
Gli abitanti di Coketown sono descritti come alienati, vivendo in case identiche, percorrendo le stesse strade e svolgendo le stesse attività ogni giorno, perdendo così la loro personalità e individualità.
La critica principale è che l'industrializzazione è vista come qualcosa di malvagio, paragonata a una giungla di guerra, caos e pericolo, con un impatto negativo sulla città e sui suoi abitanti.
Il testo sottolinea l'indifferenza e il disprezzo della classe superiore verso quella inferiore, mostrando come le condizioni di vita dei benestanti siano confortevoli ed eleganti, mentre quelle della classe operaia siano di sfruttamento e precarietà.
L'educazione a Coketown, rappresentata dalla scuola M'Choakumchild, è basata sui fatti e ha l'obiettivo di trasformare i bambini in macchine piene di fatti, soffocando la loro intelligenza e personalità.